The Power of Dignity in the Workplace
to apply your expertise and rob you of the investment you’ve made in
your work. Your ability to produce value for the organization is diminished —
and so is your morale.
The situation above illustrates one of the most common themes in
my executive students’ reports of the worst experiences they’ve had with
leaders. Leaders who undermine employee autonomy are corrosive because they
undermine the dignity of work. This is a serious issue,
because dignity is fundamental to well-being and to human and organizational
thriving. And since many of us spend the majority of our waking hours at work,
work is a major source of dignity in our lives.
Not many people would argue with this. Yet few managers
receive any guidance on how to uphold dignity in their workplaces on a
daily basis.
According to scholar Andrew Sayer, dignity is a fundamentally social phenomenon that
arises through interaction, and therefore it depends on a mix of both
independence and interdependence. It involves recognition and trust, as well as
autonomy and self-mastery. In dignified work relations, people carefully avoid
taking advantage of the inherent vulnerability of the employment relationship
and power differentials in organizations. This is why les formules de politesse,
like saying “Bonjour, Madame” at the bakery before ordering your bread, are
such a big deal in France, where I spend most of my time. It’s a voluntary act
that acknowledges that although the employee is there to serve the customer,
she is a first and foremost a human being with dignity and the autonomy to
decide how she will perform her job. (It’s also the secret to getting great
customer service in France.) Likewise, in large organization settings,
dignity exists when people are listened to and taken seriously regardless of
their position – and feel they can disagree respectfully and be heard, without
fear of reprisal.
Take this recent study of a turnaround at a badly performing
hospital that had suffered poor quality of medical care, declining patient
numbers, high staff turnover, and severe financial difficulties. The new CEO
was determined to take full advantage of the knowledge and commitment
of his experienced workforce. A history of labor-management disputes
made the challenge daunting, but he managed to put in place a shared
leadership model that relied on employees taking personal responsibility for
improving the quality of care and reducing operating costs. He
created representative councils to give employees meaningful
involvement in shaping care practices and the quality of their lives at
work. In the early phases of implementation, the researchers found that
employees contributed most to the change initiative when they believed that
doing so would increase their control over their work and work environment.
When they followed up three years after implementation, they discovered
that the employees contributing most actively to the shared leadership program
also expressed high trust in management and perceptions of fair
treatment.
These hospital workers managed to turn things around because they
were treated with dignity – which employees experience as self-worth,
self-respect, and the respect of others, as sociologist Randy Hodson explains
in Dignity
at Work, the most comprehensive
study of dignity in the workplace. Showing trust, granting autonomy, and
recognizing the value of individual contributions all build employees’
sense of ownership of their work and pride in performing it. (So does providing
the option to work from home; it is appreciated by employees not only because
it reduces work-life conflict, but also because expresses trust.)
Greater ownership, and the motivation to do well that comes with autonomy,
yield higher quality outcomes for customers.
Conversely, refusing to grant trust and autonomy and failing to
recognize and respect employee contributions corrupt the very foundations of
what makes work fulfilling.
Unfortunately, once dignity is assaulted, a downward spiral is
often set in motion. Employees may respond by reducing their effort and
commitment, which leads misguided managers, who may interpret such
employee withdrawal as petulance or unwillingness to cooperate, to treat them
with even less respect. The skilled manager, by contrast, understands that the
first steps on the pathway to superior performance are to place as much
control of work in the hands of employees as their capabilities allow and
to support their autonomous accomplishment of meaningful goals. The enlightened
leader knows to treat people with dignity.
(Initially published in Harvard Business Review)
No comments:
Post a Comment